There is a phenomenon in consumer behaviour research that is so well documented and so consistently ignored by small businesses that it borders on remarkable. When buyers cannot directly assess the quality of what they are purchasing — and in most service businesses, they cannot — they use price as a quality signal. The more expensive option is perceived as better. Not sometimes. Not in certain categories. As a consistent pattern across industries, cultures, and buyer types.

This has been demonstrated in wine tastings where the same wine was rated higher when participants were told it was more expensive. In blind tests of professional services where higher-priced proposals were assessed as more thorough. In healthcare settings where patients reported higher pain relief from placebo pills when told they cost more. The effect is not marginal. In several studies it is substantial enough to change measurable outcomes, not just stated preferences.

The implication for how you position a business is significant. If you are competing in a market where buyers cannot easily verify quality before purchase — which is most markets for expertise, advice, creative work, or complex services — then your price is not just a revenue decision. It is a positioning statement. And setting it too low communicates something about quality that you almost certainly did not intend.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Alun Hill to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Keep Reading